Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that denial of exemption u/s 11 on account of delayed filing or non-simultaneous uploading of the audit report in Form No.10B is impermissible where substantive statutory conditions for exemption are satisfied. The Tribunal determined the requirement to file Form No.10B with the return is procedural/directory, not mandatory, and technical discrepancies (including an incorrect entry of section 10(23C)(iv) instead of section 11) cannot defeat the assessee's substantive right to exemption. Consequently, the CPC and JCIT(A)'s actions assessing gross receipts as taxable income were set aside and the exemption u/s 11 was restored.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that denial of exemption u/s 11 on account of delayed filing or non-simultaneous uploading of the audit report in Form No.10B is impermissible where substantive statutory conditions for exemption are satisfied. The Tribunal determined the requirement to file Form No.10B with the return is procedural/directory, not mandatory, and technical discrepancies (including an incorrect entry of section 10(23C)(iv) instead of section 11) cannot defeat the assessee's substantive right to exemption. Consequently, the CPC and JCIT(A)'s actions assessing gross receipts as taxable income were set aside and the exemption u/s 11 was restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
