Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned appellate order, holding the petitioner-a SEZ unit-entitled to refund of unutilized IGST credit in the Electronic Credit Ledger under s.54 of the CGST Act. The Court affirmed that the input service distributor concept permits recognition of input tax credit on services received for zero-rated supplies, and applied controlling HC precedent which remains operative and unstayed. Consequently, respondents were directed to process the petitioner's refund claim forthwith. The writ succeeds, the appellate order dated 18.02.2025 is set aside, and relief is granted to effect reimbursement of the unutilized IGST credit.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned appellate order, holding the petitioner-a SEZ unit-entitled to refund of unutilized IGST credit in the Electronic Credit Ledger under s.54 of the CGST Act. The Court affirmed that the input service distributor concept permits recognition of input tax credit on services received for zero-rated supplies, and applied controlling HC precedent which remains operative and unstayed. Consequently, respondents were directed to process the petitioner's refund claim forthwith. The writ succeeds, the appellate order dated 18.02.2025 is set aside, and relief is granted to effect reimbursement of the unutilized IGST credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
