Trademark depreciation and section 14A adjustments: ITAT applies consistency, independent book-profit computation, and no disallowance without exempt ...
Rebuttable search presumptions and corroboration standards shaped deletion of unsubstantiated additions, while rental income and limited profit estima...
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned appellate order, holding the petitioner-a SEZ unit-entitled to refund of unutilized IGST credit in the Electronic Credit Ledger under s.54 of the CGST Act. The Court affirmed that the input service distributor concept permits recognition of input tax credit on services received for zero-rated supplies, and applied controlling HC precedent which remains operative and unstayed. Consequently, respondents were directed to process the petitioner's refund claim forthwith. The writ succeeds, the appellate order dated 18.02.2025 is set aside, and relief is granted to effect reimbursement of the unutilized IGST credit.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned appellate order, holding the petitioner-a SEZ unit-entitled to refund of unutilized IGST credit in the Electronic Credit Ledger under s.54 of the CGST Act. The Court affirmed that the input service distributor concept permits recognition of input tax credit on services received for zero-rated supplies, and applied controlling HC precedent which remains operative and unstayed. Consequently, respondents were directed to process the petitioner's refund claim forthwith. The writ succeeds, the appellate order dated 18.02.2025 is set aside, and relief is granted to effect reimbursement of the unutilized IGST credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
