Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2741 to 2760 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned appellate order, holding the petitioner-a SEZ unit-entitled to refund of unutilized IGST credit in the Electronic Credit Ledger under s.54 of the CGST Act. The Court affirmed that the input service distributor concept permits recognition of input tax credit on services received for zero-rated supplies, and applied controlling HC precedent which remains operative and unstayed. Consequently, respondents were directed to process the petitioner's refund claim forthwith. The writ succeeds, the appellate order dated 18.02.2025 is set aside, and relief is granted to effect reimbursement of the unutilized IGST credit.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned appellate order, holding the petitioner-a SEZ unit-entitled to refund of unutilized IGST credit in the Electronic Credit Ledger under s.54 of the CGST Act. The Court affirmed that the input service distributor concept permits recognition of input tax credit on services received for zero-rated supplies, and applied controlling HC precedent which remains operative and unstayed. Consequently, respondents were directed to process the petitioner's refund claim forthwith. The writ succeeds, the appellate order dated 18.02.2025 is set aside, and relief is granted to effect reimbursement of the unutilized IGST credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
