Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the applicant's impleadment application and condoned the delay in seeking substitution as legal representative, holding that statutory provisions under FERA and FEMA preserve the right of legal representatives to continue pending proceedings and do not impose a restrictive timeline for substitution. Having regard to the prolonged non-listing of the appeal from 2009 to 2022, the applicant's lack of knowledge of the appeal's pendency until 2023 and the peculiar facts surrounding the deceased-appellant's death, the Court found a bona fide and reasonable explanation for the delay of 3,621 days. The application for condonation is allowed and the applicant is entitled to be substituted as legal representative.
The HC allowed the applicant's impleadment application and condoned the delay in seeking substitution as legal representative, holding that statutory provisions under FERA and FEMA preserve the right of legal representatives to continue pending proceedings and do not impose a restrictive timeline for substitution. Having regard to the prolonged non-listing of the appeal from 2009 to 2022, the applicant's lack of knowledge of the appeal's pendency until 2023 and the peculiar facts surrounding the deceased-appellant's death, the Court found a bona fide and reasonable explanation for the delay of 3,621 days. The application for condonation is allowed and the applicant is entitled to be substituted as legal representative.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.