Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The HC allowed the applicant's petition and granted regular bail, concluding custodial detention was unnecessary. The court observed a complaint has been filed but no statutory notice or assessment under the SGST Act, 2017 has been issued, leaving the tax quantum unassessed and appealable. Noting the applicant's cooperation with the investigation, the economic recovery objective of the statute, and settled jurisprudence, the court found continued detention unwarranted despite allegations of availing ineligible or fake ITC from non-existent or deregistered suppliers. Having regard to the applicant's character and protracted incarceration since 20.08.2025, bail was granted without expressing any view on merits, subject to the specified conditions.
The HC allowed the applicant's petition and granted regular bail, concluding custodial detention was unnecessary. The court observed a complaint has been filed but no statutory notice or assessment under the SGST Act, 2017 has been issued, leaving the tax quantum unassessed and appealable. Noting the applicant's cooperation with the investigation, the economic recovery objective of the statute, and settled jurisprudence, the court found continued detention unwarranted despite allegations of availing ineligible or fake ITC from non-existent or deregistered suppliers. Having regard to the applicant's character and protracted incarceration since 20.08.2025, bail was granted without expressing any view on merits, subject to the specified conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
