Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld deletion of the transfer pricing upward adjustment in favour of the assessee, holding the TPO erred by applying CUP without identifying comparable uncontrolled transactions and without valid show-cause, and rejected Revenue's estoppel plea; the TPO/AO was directed to delete the royalty adjustment. Depreciation/amortization relating to 3G spectrum, DOT penalty and asset restoration costs were allowed for the assessee based on binding tribunal/high court group precedents. A written-back liability arising from capital equipment was treated as business income and the assessee's claim was disallowed. Finance-lease payments to IBM were directed to be allowed as revenue expenditure. Capitalisation of licence fees was disallowed in line with Supreme Court authority, while miscellaneous expenses written off were permitted for computing book profits under section 115JB.
The ITAT upheld deletion of the transfer pricing upward adjustment in favour of the assessee, holding the TPO erred by applying CUP without identifying comparable uncontrolled transactions and without valid show-cause, and rejected Revenue's estoppel plea; the TPO/AO was directed to delete the royalty adjustment. Depreciation/amortization relating to 3G spectrum, DOT penalty and asset restoration costs were allowed for the assessee based on binding tribunal/high court group precedents. A written-back liability arising from capital equipment was treated as business income and the assessee's claim was disallowed. Finance-lease payments to IBM were directed to be allowed as revenue expenditure. Capitalisation of licence fees was disallowed in line with Supreme Court authority, while miscellaneous expenses written off were permitted for computing book profits under section 115JB.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.