Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld deletion of the transfer pricing upward adjustment in favour of the assessee, holding the TPO erred by applying CUP without identifying comparable uncontrolled transactions and without valid show-cause, and rejected Revenue's estoppel plea; the TPO/AO was directed to delete the royalty adjustment. Depreciation/amortization relating to 3G spectrum, DOT penalty and asset restoration costs were allowed for the assessee based on binding tribunal/high court group precedents. A written-back liability arising from capital equipment was treated as business income and the assessee's claim was disallowed. Finance-lease payments to IBM were directed to be allowed as revenue expenditure. Capitalisation of licence fees was disallowed in line with Supreme Court authority, while miscellaneous expenses written off were permitted for computing book profits under section 115JB.
The ITAT upheld deletion of the transfer pricing upward adjustment in favour of the assessee, holding the TPO erred by applying CUP without identifying comparable uncontrolled transactions and without valid show-cause, and rejected Revenue's estoppel plea; the TPO/AO was directed to delete the royalty adjustment. Depreciation/amortization relating to 3G spectrum, DOT penalty and asset restoration costs were allowed for the assessee based on binding tribunal/high court group precedents. A written-back liability arising from capital equipment was treated as business income and the assessee's claim was disallowed. Finance-lease payments to IBM were directed to be allowed as revenue expenditure. Capitalisation of licence fees was disallowed in line with Supreme Court authority, while miscellaneous expenses written off were permitted for computing book profits under section 115JB.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.