Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee's equity investments in its foreign wholly-owned subsidiary were bona fide business investments made to acquire and expand an operating concern abroad; the write-off of the foreign investment (Rs. 97,61,190) was a commercial loss deductible as business loss (not capital loss or bad debt) and the Commissioner (A) was reversed. The Tribunal also deleted an addition under s.68/115BBE in respect of USD 154,282 (Rs. 99,23,830), finding the receipt to be an advance against supplies from an identified related foreign customer remitted through banking channels with supporting documentation; consequently the identity, genuineness and source were established. Ground(s) allowed.
The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee's equity investments in its foreign wholly-owned subsidiary were bona fide business investments made to acquire and expand an operating concern abroad; the write-off of the foreign investment (Rs. 97,61,190) was a commercial loss deductible as business loss (not capital loss or bad debt) and the Commissioner (A) was reversed. The Tribunal also deleted an addition under s.68/115BBE in respect of USD 154,282 (Rs. 99,23,830), finding the receipt to be an advance against supplies from an identified related foreign customer remitted through banking channels with supporting documentation; consequently the identity, genuineness and source were established. Ground(s) allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.