Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT affirmed the PCIT's exercise of revisional jurisdiction under section 263, dismissing all grounds urged by the assessee. The Tribunal held that challenges to the jurisdictional validity of the original assessment for lack of notice under section 143(2) were not admissible in a revision appeal and were untimely, leaving the assessee free to raise them in proceedings on the assessment. The claim that receipts arose from three distinct educational institutions attracting exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) failed for want of a return claim, non-compliance and absence of verifiable recognition for multiple entities. The AO's allowance of 85% expenditure without adequate verification was found erroneous and prejudicial, and the revision order setting aside the assessment was upheld.
The ITAT affirmed the PCIT's exercise of revisional jurisdiction under section 263, dismissing all grounds urged by the assessee. The Tribunal held that challenges to the jurisdictional validity of the original assessment for lack of notice under section 143(2) were not admissible in a revision appeal and were untimely, leaving the assessee free to raise them in proceedings on the assessment. The claim that receipts arose from three distinct educational institutions attracting exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) failed for want of a return claim, non-compliance and absence of verifiable recognition for multiple entities. The AO's allowance of 85% expenditure without adequate verification was found erroneous and prejudicial, and the revision order setting aside the assessment was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.