Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17)...
Registration under section 12AA granted where substantive charitable objects for ex-servicemen, incidental commercial activity permitted and profits a...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9921 to 9940 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned adjudication: imported clear float glass with an absorbent, non-reflecting layer is classifiable under CTH 7005 1090 and qualifies for the Nil BCD benefit under Sl. No. 934 of N/N. 46/2011. The Tribunal found the presence of an absorbent layer to be decisive irrespective of its mode of formation and relied on laboratory test evidence; reclassification to CTH 7005 2990 and application of Sl. No. 935(i) (5% BCD) were held unsustainable. Consequent demands for differential duty, interest and penalties were quashed. The appeal was allowed and the impugned order set aside.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned adjudication: imported clear float glass with an absorbent, non-reflecting layer is classifiable under CTH 7005 1090 and qualifies for the Nil BCD benefit under Sl. No. 934 of N/N. 46/2011. The Tribunal found the presence of an absorbent layer to be decisive irrespective of its mode of formation and relied on laboratory test evidence; reclassification to CTH 7005 2990 and application of Sl. No. 935(i) (5% BCD) were held unsustainable. Consequent demands for differential duty, interest and penalties were quashed. The appeal was allowed and the impugned order set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
