Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned adjudication dated 18.02.2015 and quashing demands, penalty and confirmation of differential excise duty arising from DTA clearances by the 100% EOU. The Tribunal held that classification for excise, customs and FTP compliance follows the common eight-digit HSN-based commodity code (notably heading 3002 for the pharmaceutical products in issue), and the vaccines and formulations cleared to the DTA are "similar goods" for levy purposes. DTA clearances complied with FTP paras 6.8(a)/(k) and, where advances were accounted, were eligible for exemption under Notification No.23/2003-C.E.; the departmental treatment was legally unsustainable.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned adjudication dated 18.02.2015 and quashing demands, penalty and confirmation of differential excise duty arising from DTA clearances by the 100% EOU. The Tribunal held that classification for excise, customs and FTP compliance follows the common eight-digit HSN-based commodity code (notably heading 3002 for the pharmaceutical products in issue), and the vaccines and formulations cleared to the DTA are "similar goods" for levy purposes. DTA clearances complied with FTP paras 6.8(a)/(k) and, where advances were accounted, were eligible for exemption under Notification No.23/2003-C.E.; the departmental treatment was legally unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.