Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Market value for captive electricity consumption follows industrial consumer tariffs, supporting profit computation for the power generation deduction...
The HC disposed the writ petition directing that, because the GST registration was cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) for non-furnishing of returns for six months, the petitioners may seek restoration by approaching the duly empowered officer within two months. If the petitioners furnish all pending returns and make full payment of tax dues with applicable interest and late fee, the officer may, in accordance with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, consider dropping the cancellation proceedings and pass an appropriate order in Form GST REG-20. The writ is disposed on this mandate, enabling administrative restoration subject to compliance with the prescribed procedural and payment requirements.
The HC disposed the writ petition directing that, because the GST registration was cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) for non-furnishing of returns for six months, the petitioners may seek restoration by approaching the duly empowered officer within two months. If the petitioners furnish all pending returns and make full payment of tax dues with applicable interest and late fee, the officer may, in accordance with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, consider dropping the cancellation proceedings and pass an appropriate order in Form GST REG-20. The writ is disposed on this mandate, enabling administrative restoration subject to compliance with the prescribed procedural and payment requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.