Registration under s.12AB upheld; CIT(Exemptions) exceeded jurisdiction by deciding taxability instead of preliminary verification and registration di...
Dependent Agent PE unresolved for lack of factual inquiry; arm's-length distribution accepted; royalty claim rejected; 15% refund interest (Section 24...
The HC disposed the writ petition directing that, because the GST registration was cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) for non-furnishing of returns for six months, the petitioners may seek restoration by approaching the duly empowered officer within two months. If the petitioners furnish all pending returns and make full payment of tax dues with applicable interest and late fee, the officer may, in accordance with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, consider dropping the cancellation proceedings and pass an appropriate order in Form GST REG-20. The writ is disposed on this mandate, enabling administrative restoration subject to compliance with the prescribed procedural and payment requirements.
The HC disposed the writ petition directing that, because the GST registration was cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) for non-furnishing of returns for six months, the petitioners may seek restoration by approaching the duly empowered officer within two months. If the petitioners furnish all pending returns and make full payment of tax dues with applicable interest and late fee, the officer may, in accordance with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, consider dropping the cancellation proceedings and pass an appropriate order in Form GST REG-20. The writ is disposed on this mandate, enabling administrative restoration subject to compliance with the prescribed procedural and payment requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
