Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC allowed the applicant's prayer for regular bail and ordered release on bail subject to specified conditions to be observed pending investigation and trial. The court found arrest dated 26.08.2025 occurred without requisite subjective satisfaction and absent the statutory "reason to believe" under s.69 CGST Act. The court recorded that substantial investigation is complete, no prior criminal antecedents exist, no risk of absconding or tampering with evidence is shown, and the applicant lodged a payment of Rs.84,00,000 with the GST Department (receipt taken on record). In light of these factors, bail was granted on terms tailored to safeguard the investigatory process and prosecution.
The HC allowed the applicant's prayer for regular bail and ordered release on bail subject to specified conditions to be observed pending investigation and trial. The court found arrest dated 26.08.2025 occurred without requisite subjective satisfaction and absent the statutory "reason to believe" under s.69 CGST Act. The court recorded that substantial investigation is complete, no prior criminal antecedents exist, no risk of absconding or tampering with evidence is shown, and the applicant lodged a payment of Rs.84,00,000 with the GST Department (receipt taken on record). In light of these factors, bail was granted on terms tailored to safeguard the investigatory process and prosecution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
