Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the transfer pricing addition and related disallowance under s.37, rejecting the Revenue's determination of NIL ALP for intra-group services. The Tribunal overturned the TPO/DRP finding that the Taxpayer failed the need, purpose, rendition and benefit tests, held the Taxpayer's corroborative benchmarking (TNMM with the Indian entity as tested party and operating profit/sales as PLI) to be admissible, and directed the TPO to compute the ALP in accordance with that corroborative benchmarking after verifying the PLI computation. The ITAT declined the Revenue's submission equating the TPO approach to the "Other Method" and dismissed the AO/DRP directions disallowing the payments.
The ITAT set aside the transfer pricing addition and related disallowance under s.37, rejecting the Revenue's determination of NIL ALP for intra-group services. The Tribunal overturned the TPO/DRP finding that the Taxpayer failed the need, purpose, rendition and benefit tests, held the Taxpayer's corroborative benchmarking (TNMM with the Indian entity as tested party and operating profit/sales as PLI) to be admissible, and directed the TPO to compute the ALP in accordance with that corroborative benchmarking after verifying the PLI computation. The ITAT declined the Revenue's submission equating the TPO approach to the "Other Method" and dismissed the AO/DRP directions disallowing the payments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
