Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and held that, on the materials placed before the CIT(Exemption), the assessee's objects qualify as charitable within the meaning of s.2(15) and the activities of operating an approved school and college conform to those objects. The Tribunal found the genuineness of activities established, no statutory or regulatory violations shown, and the alleged failure to furnish details insufficient to deny relief. Consequently, the Tribunal held the assessee eligible for registration under s.12A read with s.12AB and directed CIT(Exemption)-Pune to grant registration to the assessee forthwith.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and held that, on the materials placed before the CIT(Exemption), the assessee's objects qualify as charitable within the meaning of s.2(15) and the activities of operating an approved school and college conform to those objects. The Tribunal found the genuineness of activities established, no statutory or regulatory violations shown, and the alleged failure to furnish details insufficient to deny relief. Consequently, the Tribunal held the assessee eligible for registration under s.12A read with s.12AB and directed CIT(Exemption)-Pune to grant registration to the assessee forthwith.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.