Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)/NFAC orders and dismissed the Revenue's appeals. The Tribunal held that denial of deduction under s.35(2AB) for non-production of Form 3CM was a procedural lapse where DSIR recognition subsisted and post-assessment Form 3CL cured the defect, warranting allowance of the weighted deduction. The Tribunal allowed the s.80-IC claim made in appellate proceedings, accepted CSR expenditure as deductible under s.80G, and treated ROC fees, stamp duty and listing fees for bonus issues as revenue expenditure. Consistent accounting for duty drawback was affirmed and no excess deduction under s.35(1)(iv) was found; all Revenue grounds were dismissed.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)/NFAC orders and dismissed the Revenue's appeals. The Tribunal held that denial of deduction under s.35(2AB) for non-production of Form 3CM was a procedural lapse where DSIR recognition subsisted and post-assessment Form 3CL cured the defect, warranting allowance of the weighted deduction. The Tribunal allowed the s.80-IC claim made in appellate proceedings, accepted CSR expenditure as deductible under s.80G, and treated ROC fees, stamp duty and listing fees for bonus issues as revenue expenditure. Consistent accounting for duty drawback was affirmed and no excess deduction under s.35(1)(iv) was found; all Revenue grounds were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
