Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the appellant's reference, holding its jurisdiction under the statutory scheme is confined to questions of law and it cannot reappraise findings of fact settled by the Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Tribunal. The court found no perversity in the impugned factual inferences, upheld admissibility and corroborative value of statements and seized material, and concluded the respondent agency lawfully exercised confiscation powers over Indian currency and contraband. The appellant failed to discharge the shifted evidential onus to prove lawful source or lack of intent to illegally procure foreign exchange; the conduct and recoveries established attempted contravention. Consequently, the adjudicatory and appellate orders were affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
The HC dismissed the appellant's reference, holding its jurisdiction under the statutory scheme is confined to questions of law and it cannot reappraise findings of fact settled by the Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Tribunal. The court found no perversity in the impugned factual inferences, upheld admissibility and corroborative value of statements and seized material, and concluded the respondent agency lawfully exercised confiscation powers over Indian currency and contraband. The appellant failed to discharge the shifted evidential onus to prove lawful source or lack of intent to illegally procure foreign exchange; the conduct and recoveries established attempted contravention. Consequently, the adjudicatory and appellate orders were affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
