Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT held that Indian banks are not recipients of services of foreign banks in export/import transactions for settlement of foreign remittances and therefore are not liable to pay service tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism for bank charges deducted by foreign or correspondent banks. The Tribunal relied on prior coordinate bench reasoning and relevant High Court authority distinguishing exporter/importer liability from the bank's role. The adjudged demands, interest and penalties levied on the appellants for alleged service tax liability on such bank charges were found legally unsustainable. The impugned orders confirming liability are set aside and the appeal is allowed, with the contested demands, interest and penalties quashed.
CESTAT held that Indian banks are not recipients of services of foreign banks in export/import transactions for settlement of foreign remittances and therefore are not liable to pay service tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism for bank charges deducted by foreign or correspondent banks. The Tribunal relied on prior coordinate bench reasoning and relevant High Court authority distinguishing exporter/importer liability from the bank's role. The adjudged demands, interest and penalties levied on the appellants for alleged service tax liability on such bank charges were found legally unsustainable. The impugned orders confirming liability are set aside and the appeal is allowed, with the contested demands, interest and penalties quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.