Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
HC remitted the matter to the 1st Respondent Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) to pass a fresh, consolidated order on all issues other than the demand previously confirmed solely for belated availing of Input Tax Credit (ITC), in light of the retrospective insertion of Rule 16(5) into the GST Rules effective 01.07.2017. The Court held the amendment warrants reconsideration of the ITC-related demand and therefore quashed the finality of that aspect for reassessment. For the remaining disputed issues, the 1st Respondent shall decide afresh provided the Petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Petition disposed of.
HC remitted the matter to the 1st Respondent Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) to pass a fresh, consolidated order on all issues other than the demand previously confirmed solely for belated availing of Input Tax Credit (ITC), in light of the retrospective insertion of Rule 16(5) into the GST Rules effective 01.07.2017. The Court held the amendment warrants reconsideration of the ITC-related demand and therefore quashed the finality of that aspect for reassessment. For the remaining disputed issues, the 1st Respondent shall decide afresh provided the Petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
