Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC remitted the matter to the 1st Respondent Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) to pass a fresh, consolidated order on all issues other than the demand previously confirmed solely for belated availing of Input Tax Credit (ITC), in light of the retrospective insertion of Rule 16(5) into the GST Rules effective 01.07.2017. The Court held the amendment warrants reconsideration of the ITC-related demand and therefore quashed the finality of that aspect for reassessment. For the remaining disputed issues, the 1st Respondent shall decide afresh provided the Petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Petition disposed of.
HC remitted the matter to the 1st Respondent Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) to pass a fresh, consolidated order on all issues other than the demand previously confirmed solely for belated availing of Input Tax Credit (ITC), in light of the retrospective insertion of Rule 16(5) into the GST Rules effective 01.07.2017. The Court held the amendment warrants reconsideration of the ITC-related demand and therefore quashed the finality of that aspect for reassessment. For the remaining disputed issues, the 1st Respondent shall decide afresh provided the Petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
