Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
HC remitted the matter to the 1st Respondent Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) to pass a fresh, consolidated order on all issues other than the demand previously confirmed solely for belated availing of Input Tax Credit (ITC), in light of the retrospective insertion of Rule 16(5) into the GST Rules effective 01.07.2017. The Court held the amendment warrants reconsideration of the ITC-related demand and therefore quashed the finality of that aspect for reassessment. For the remaining disputed issues, the 1st Respondent shall decide afresh provided the Petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Petition disposed of.
HC remitted the matter to the 1st Respondent Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) to pass a fresh, consolidated order on all issues other than the demand previously confirmed solely for belated availing of Input Tax Credit (ITC), in light of the retrospective insertion of Rule 16(5) into the GST Rules effective 01.07.2017. The Court held the amendment warrants reconsideration of the ITC-related demand and therefore quashed the finality of that aspect for reassessment. For the remaining disputed issues, the 1st Respondent shall decide afresh provided the Petitioner deposits 50% of the disputed tax in cash from its electronic cash ledger within 30 days of receipt of the order. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
