Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustments relating to AMP expenditure and Asian regional headquarter allocations, held warranty reimbursements were pass-through with no markup, and upheld no merit in adjustments for design and development charges. Royalty adjustments were fixed per prior years (resulting in an Rs. 18,70,787 adjustment for 2001-12); royalties in specified assessment years were held at arm's length or restored to the AO for determination in light of a CA certificate. Expatriate salaries were allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1). Section 80JJAA relief was allowed with retrospective effect as clarificatory. Refund claim for excess DDT was dismissed. Disallowances under s.40(a)(ia), repairs and maintenance, and penalty u/s 271(1)(c) were deleted.
The ITAT directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustments relating to AMP expenditure and Asian regional headquarter allocations, held warranty reimbursements were pass-through with no markup, and upheld no merit in adjustments for design and development charges. Royalty adjustments were fixed per prior years (resulting in an Rs. 18,70,787 adjustment for 2001-12); royalties in specified assessment years were held at arm's length or restored to the AO for determination in light of a CA certificate. Expatriate salaries were allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1). Section 80JJAA relief was allowed with retrospective effect as clarificatory. Refund claim for excess DDT was dismissed. Disallowances under s.40(a)(ia), repairs and maintenance, and penalty u/s 271(1)(c) were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.