Petition dismissed; petitioner allowed to submit detailed disclosures and documents for re-consideration; notices for 2019-23 may be adjudicated on me...
Confiscation and duty recovery quashed where licensing records show export obligation discharged; customs lacks jurisdiction absent licence annulment ...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10161 to 10180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT set aside the impugned disallowances and allowed the claimed deductions. The tribunal deleted the disallowance under s.14A r.w.r.8D, applying the principle that major expenditures must correlate with exempt income. Disallowances of brokerage payments were held to be ordinary course business expenses for entities engaged in commercial property leasing and were deleted where TDS evidence was furnished. Denial of deduction under s.80IAB for car-parking rental income was reversed, the tribunal finding no distinguishing facts to deny the incentive. Settlement fees paid on premature termination of service contracts were characterized as revenue expenditure incurred for commercial expediency (not capital acquisition) and allowed. The ITAT therefore ruled in favour of the assessee on the contested adjustments.
The ITAT set aside the impugned disallowances and allowed the claimed deductions. The tribunal deleted the disallowance under s.14A r.w.r.8D, applying the principle that major expenditures must correlate with exempt income. Disallowances of brokerage payments were held to be ordinary course business expenses for entities engaged in commercial property leasing and were deleted where TDS evidence was furnished. Denial of deduction under s.80IAB for car-parking rental income was reversed, the tribunal finding no distinguishing facts to deny the incentive. Settlement fees paid on premature termination of service contracts were characterized as revenue expenditure incurred for commercial expediency (not capital acquisition) and allowed. The ITAT therefore ruled in favour of the assessee on the contested adjustments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.