Petition dismissed; petitioner allowed to submit detailed disclosures and documents for re-consideration; notices for 2019-23 may be adjudicated on me...
Confiscation and duty recovery quashed where licensing records show export obligation discharged; customs lacks jurisdiction absent licence annulment ...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10141 to 10160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that the Optical Interface Modules are classifiable under CTH 85177090 as accepted by departmental authorities, and that the Revenue is precluded from contesting that accepted position. The Tribunal directed the jurisdictional authorities to refund the customs duty paid by the Respondent, with interest at 12% per annum, payable from three months after the date of initial payment until the date of refund, excluding the initial three-month processing period from interest computation. The Tribunal ordered prompt disbursement in view of the prolonged financial hardship and increased fiscal burden caused by delay.
The Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that the Optical Interface Modules are classifiable under CTH 85177090 as accepted by departmental authorities, and that the Revenue is precluded from contesting that accepted position. The Tribunal directed the jurisdictional authorities to refund the customs duty paid by the Respondent, with interest at 12% per annum, payable from three months after the date of initial payment until the date of refund, excluding the initial three-month processing period from interest computation. The Tribunal ordered prompt disbursement in view of the prolonged financial hardship and increased fiscal burden caused by delay.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
