Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the duty demand. The...
Appeal allowed: Domestic service payments excluded from transaction value under Valuation Rules; CKD subassemblies deemed non-motor vehicles, get concessional duty
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the duty demand. The Tribunal held that payments to a domestic third party were for services performed in India, were not payable to the seller, did not accrue to the seller as consideration for the imported goods, and therefore could not be included in transaction value under the Valuation Rules. The work performed was not a "condition of sale" of the goods. Further, CKD kits (engine, gearbox, transmission) remain non-motor vehicles until assembled; "preassembled" requires independent but unintegrated subassemblies, entitling the imports to the concessional/lowest duty rate. The demand and adverse adjudication against the appellant were quashed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the duty demand. The Tribunal held that payments to a domestic third party were for services performed in India, were not payable to the seller, did not accrue to the seller as consideration for the imported goods, and therefore could not be included in transaction value under the Valuation Rules. The work performed was not a "condition of sale" of the goods. Further, CKD kits (engine, gearbox, transmission) remain non-motor vehicles until assembled; "preassembled" requires independent but unintegrated subassemblies, entitling the imports to the concessional/lowest duty rate. The demand and adverse adjudication against the appellant were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.