Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the Section 7 petition was maintainable. The Tribunal held the Financial Creditor proved acknowledgment, part-payments and documentary confirmations giving rise to fresh causes of action under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act and/or fresh limitation under Sections 18 and 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963; alternatively, limitation was suspended under Section 17 until discovery of the fraud on 27.12.2019, with the petition filed within one year thereafter. The Appellant was found complicit in concealing defaults; equitable bars were rejected and the Company Petition was held not time-barred. Appeal dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the Section 7 petition was maintainable. The Tribunal held the Financial Creditor proved acknowledgment, part-payments and documentary confirmations giving rise to fresh causes of action under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act and/or fresh limitation under Sections 18 and 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963; alternatively, limitation was suspended under Section 17 until discovery of the fraud on 27.12.2019, with the petition filed within one year thereafter. The Appellant was found complicit in concealing defaults; equitable bars were rejected and the Company Petition was held not time-barred. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
