Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the Section 7 petition was maintainable. The Tribunal held the Financial Creditor proved acknowledgment, part-payments and documentary confirmations giving rise to fresh causes of action under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act and/or fresh limitation under Sections 18 and 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963; alternatively, limitation was suspended under Section 17 until discovery of the fraud on 27.12.2019, with the petition filed within one year thereafter. The Appellant was found complicit in concealing defaults; equitable bars were rejected and the Company Petition was held not time-barred. Appeal dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the Section 7 petition was maintainable. The Tribunal held the Financial Creditor proved acknowledgment, part-payments and documentary confirmations giving rise to fresh causes of action under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act and/or fresh limitation under Sections 18 and 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963; alternatively, limitation was suspended under Section 17 until discovery of the fraud on 27.12.2019, with the petition filed within one year thereafter. The Appellant was found complicit in concealing defaults; equitable bars were rejected and the Company Petition was held not time-barred. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
