Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The HC sets aside the impugned order dated 8/9/2025 that blocked the petitioner's credit ledger account for failure to comply with the procedural mandate of Rule 86-A, noting the absence of contemporaneous reasons and insufficiency of the "reason to believe" standard as applied; the tribunal/authority is also directed to provide a post-decisional hearing which the petitioner is willing to avail. Relief is granted on condition that the petitioner furnishes a bank guarantee from a nationalised bank in the sum of Rs.6,50,00,000. The petition is disposed of accordingly, subject to compliance with the conditional direction and reservation of appropriate administrative follow-up.
The HC sets aside the impugned order dated 8/9/2025 that blocked the petitioner's credit ledger account for failure to comply with the procedural mandate of Rule 86-A, noting the absence of contemporaneous reasons and insufficiency of the "reason to believe" standard as applied; the tribunal/authority is also directed to provide a post-decisional hearing which the petitioner is willing to avail. Relief is granted on condition that the petitioner furnishes a bank guarantee from a nationalised bank in the sum of Rs.6,50,00,000. The petition is disposed of accordingly, subject to compliance with the conditional direction and reservation of appropriate administrative follow-up.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
