Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC sets aside the impugned order dated 8/9/2025 that blocked the petitioner's credit ledger account for failure to comply with the procedural mandate of Rule 86-A, noting the absence of contemporaneous reasons and insufficiency of the "reason to believe" standard as applied; the tribunal/authority is also directed to provide a post-decisional hearing which the petitioner is willing to avail. Relief is granted on condition that the petitioner furnishes a bank guarantee from a nationalised bank in the sum of Rs.6,50,00,000. The petition is disposed of accordingly, subject to compliance with the conditional direction and reservation of appropriate administrative follow-up.
The HC sets aside the impugned order dated 8/9/2025 that blocked the petitioner's credit ledger account for failure to comply with the procedural mandate of Rule 86-A, noting the absence of contemporaneous reasons and insufficiency of the "reason to believe" standard as applied; the tribunal/authority is also directed to provide a post-decisional hearing which the petitioner is willing to avail. Relief is granted on condition that the petitioner furnishes a bank guarantee from a nationalised bank in the sum of Rs.6,50,00,000. The petition is disposed of accordingly, subject to compliance with the conditional direction and reservation of appropriate administrative follow-up.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.