Reassessment under s.148A held valid; s.69 additions totaling Rs.7,00,000 deleted after acceptable contemporaneous explanations for property investmen...
Adjudication set aside; Rule 9 valuation based on internet engineer report quashed for Rule 3(4) non-compliance; Section 138B cross-examination requir...
The HC held that the petitioner, having subsequently filed requisite returns and paid assessed tax following issuance of best-judgment assessment orders under s.62(1) of the UPGST Act, benefited from the deeming fiction in s.62(2) so that further demands were required to be withdrawn. Creation of liens and freezing of the petitioner's bank accounts under s.79 more than a year after taxes were paid was held impermissible as applied in the circumstances and constituted an unduly harsh exercise of recovery powers; invocation of s.79 for recovery was therefore ultra vires as to these amounts. The petition was allowed and disposed of.
The HC held that the petitioner, having subsequently filed requisite returns and paid assessed tax following issuance of best-judgment assessment orders under s.62(1) of the UPGST Act, benefited from the deeming fiction in s.62(2) so that further demands were required to be withdrawn. Creation of liens and freezing of the petitioner's bank accounts under s.79 more than a year after taxes were paid was held impermissible as applied in the circumstances and constituted an unduly harsh exercise of recovery powers; invocation of s.79 for recovery was therefore ultra vires as to these amounts. The petition was allowed and disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
