Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that prosecution under s.276C(2) could not be sustained for mere delay in depositing self-assessment tax where the assessee subsequently paid the tax and pleaded bona fide financial difficulty. The court distinguished "failure" from "willful evasion," noting s.276C(2) requires willful evasion of tax, not mere non-payment, and observations from cases addressing deliberate evasion are inapplicable absent similar facts. The complaint did not prima facie establish willfulness; allegations fell short to rebut the assessee's plea of financial hardship. The Department bears the onus to negativate those difficulties; the statutory presumption of culpability arises only after the foundational ingredients are prima facie proved.
HC held that prosecution under s.276C(2) could not be sustained for mere delay in depositing self-assessment tax where the assessee subsequently paid the tax and pleaded bona fide financial difficulty. The court distinguished "failure" from "willful evasion," noting s.276C(2) requires willful evasion of tax, not mere non-payment, and observations from cases addressing deliberate evasion are inapplicable absent similar facts. The complaint did not prima facie establish willfulness; allegations fell short to rebut the assessee's plea of financial hardship. The Department bears the onus to negativate those difficulties; the statutory presumption of culpability arises only after the foundational ingredients are prima facie proved.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.