Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
HC held that prosecution under s.276C(2) could not be sustained for mere delay in depositing self-assessment tax where the assessee subsequently paid the tax and pleaded bona fide financial difficulty. The court distinguished "failure" from "willful evasion," noting s.276C(2) requires willful evasion of tax, not mere non-payment, and observations from cases addressing deliberate evasion are inapplicable absent similar facts. The complaint did not prima facie establish willfulness; allegations fell short to rebut the assessee's plea of financial hardship. The Department bears the onus to negativate those difficulties; the statutory presumption of culpability arises only after the foundational ingredients are prima facie proved.
HC held that prosecution under s.276C(2) could not be sustained for mere delay in depositing self-assessment tax where the assessee subsequently paid the tax and pleaded bona fide financial difficulty. The court distinguished "failure" from "willful evasion," noting s.276C(2) requires willful evasion of tax, not mere non-payment, and observations from cases addressing deliberate evasion are inapplicable absent similar facts. The complaint did not prima facie establish willfulness; allegations fell short to rebut the assessee's plea of financial hardship. The Department bears the onus to negativate those difficulties; the statutory presumption of culpability arises only after the foundational ingredients are prima facie proved.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.