Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC set aside and quashed the respondent's assessment and demand notices, holding that the Principal Commissioner rightly limited proceedings to an Rs. 80 lakh property purchase and treated only Rs. 2,84,060 as assessable under s.69. The court accepted that the applicant had availed the Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016 and had declared and credited disclosed amounts to bank accounts, precluding the Revenue from reopening tax liability on those disclosures absent fraud or misrepresentation. Consequently the HC quashed the assessment framed under ss.147, 144 and 144B and the impugned order dated 14.11.2023, thereby nullifying consequential notices and restraining further assessment beyond the restricted scope determined by the appellate authority.
The HC set aside and quashed the respondent's assessment and demand notices, holding that the Principal Commissioner rightly limited proceedings to an Rs. 80 lakh property purchase and treated only Rs. 2,84,060 as assessable under s.69. The court accepted that the applicant had availed the Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016 and had declared and credited disclosed amounts to bank accounts, precluding the Revenue from reopening tax liability on those disclosures absent fraud or misrepresentation. Consequently the HC quashed the assessment framed under ss.147, 144 and 144B and the impugned order dated 14.11.2023, thereby nullifying consequential notices and restraining further assessment beyond the restricted scope determined by the appellate authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
