Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee (an AOP), held that receipts characterised as donations returned to the entity did not attract exclusion under principles of mutuality, and directed the AO to delete the disallowances and additions. The Tribunal found the assessee's dominant activity (petrol bunk business) involved sales to members and non-members, discounts/rebates constituted ordinary business expenditure and were allowable under the tax law when net profit was offered to tax. The Tribunal rejected the AO's recharacterisation and reassessment under jurisdictional review, concluded there was identity between contributors and beneficiaries, distinguished the contrary authority, and upheld the assessee's return of income.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee (an AOP), held that receipts characterised as donations returned to the entity did not attract exclusion under principles of mutuality, and directed the AO to delete the disallowances and additions. The Tribunal found the assessee's dominant activity (petrol bunk business) involved sales to members and non-members, discounts/rebates constituted ordinary business expenditure and were allowable under the tax law when net profit was offered to tax. The Tribunal rejected the AO's recharacterisation and reassessment under jurisdictional review, concluded there was identity between contributors and beneficiaries, distinguished the contrary authority, and upheld the assessee's return of income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.