Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the Assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, set aside the impugned dismissal under s. 249(2) as time-barred, and remanded the matter to the Ld. Commissioner for decision on merits after affording the Assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The Tribunal found that the Assessee acted with due diligence and in good faith, having pursued s. 154 proceedings, and was therefore entitled to exclusion/leniency for time spent in those proceedings; consequently no delay in filing the appeal to the Commissioner was found, and any attributable delay is to be condoned in view of the principles of s. 14 (Limitation Act). The matter is restored for fresh adjudication on merits.
ITAT allowed the Assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, set aside the impugned dismissal under s. 249(2) as time-barred, and remanded the matter to the Ld. Commissioner for decision on merits after affording the Assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The Tribunal found that the Assessee acted with due diligence and in good faith, having pursued s. 154 proceedings, and was therefore entitled to exclusion/leniency for time spent in those proceedings; consequently no delay in filing the appeal to the Commissioner was found, and any attributable delay is to be condoned in view of the principles of s. 14 (Limitation Act). The matter is restored for fresh adjudication on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
