Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the Assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, set aside the impugned dismissal under s. 249(2) as time-barred, and remanded the matter to the Ld. Commissioner for decision on merits after affording the Assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The Tribunal found that the Assessee acted with due diligence and in good faith, having pursued s. 154 proceedings, and was therefore entitled to exclusion/leniency for time spent in those proceedings; consequently no delay in filing the appeal to the Commissioner was found, and any attributable delay is to be condoned in view of the principles of s. 14 (Limitation Act). The matter is restored for fresh adjudication on merits.
ITAT allowed the Assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, set aside the impugned dismissal under s. 249(2) as time-barred, and remanded the matter to the Ld. Commissioner for decision on merits after affording the Assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The Tribunal found that the Assessee acted with due diligence and in good faith, having pursued s. 154 proceedings, and was therefore entitled to exclusion/leniency for time spent in those proceedings; consequently no delay in filing the appeal to the Commissioner was found, and any attributable delay is to be condoned in view of the principles of s. 14 (Limitation Act). The matter is restored for fresh adjudication on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.