Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the denial of registration...
Registration under s.12AB upheld; CIT(Exemptions) exceeded jurisdiction by deciding taxability instead of preliminary verification and registration directed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the denial of registration under s.12AB, holding that the Commissioner (Exemptions) exceeded statutory jurisdiction by adjudicating taxability at the registration stage. The court held the CIT(E)'s function under s.12AB is confined to preliminary verification of the trust's objects and genuineness of activities; substantive determinations as to eligibility for exemption and taxability of specific receipts lie within assessment proceedings by the AO. Registration is a facilitative, preliminary step enabling claims under ss.11-12, and may be refused only where objects are non-charitable or activities are shown to be ingenuine. The assessee's activities were found to qualify as general public utility and registration was directed to be granted.
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the denial of registration under s.12AB, holding that the Commissioner (Exemptions) exceeded statutory jurisdiction by adjudicating taxability at the registration stage. The court held the CIT(E)'s function under s.12AB is confined to preliminary verification of the trust's objects and genuineness of activities; substantive determinations as to eligibility for exemption and taxability of specific receipts lie within assessment proceedings by the AO. Registration is a facilitative, preliminary step enabling claims under ss.11-12, and may be refused only where objects are non-charitable or activities are shown to be ingenuine. The assessee's activities were found to qualify as general public utility and registration was directed to be granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.