Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT observed that the rejection of the assessee's applications for registration u/s 12AA and approval u/s 80G, premised on non-registration under the RPT and questioned genuineness of activities, could not be sustained without affording an opportunity to cure curable defects. Noting that RPT registration was in the finalization stage, the Tribunal held that a liberal approach is warranted, declined to decide merits, and remitted the matter to the assessing authority with a direction to afford the assessee an adequate opportunity of hearing and to permit submission of clarifications and documents to establish registration status and genuineness before passing a fresh decision.
ITAT observed that the rejection of the assessee's applications for registration u/s 12AA and approval u/s 80G, premised on non-registration under the RPT and questioned genuineness of activities, could not be sustained without affording an opportunity to cure curable defects. Noting that RPT registration was in the finalization stage, the Tribunal held that a liberal approach is warranted, declined to decide merits, and remitted the matter to the assessing authority with a direction to afford the assessee an adequate opportunity of hearing and to permit submission of clarifications and documents to establish registration status and genuineness before passing a fresh decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.