Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed the appeal, holding the transactions to be benami. The Tribunal found that the Appellant effected indirect investment through a benamidar and family to acquire tribal lands, rather than extending a genuine loan: the benamidar disclaimed knowledge, his bank account was operated by the Appellant, no loan agreement, security or repayment capacity was demonstrated, and rapid reconveyance of several parcels to the Appellant evidenced sham transactions. Applying the statutory benami framework, the AT concluded that the 57 sale deeds in the benamidar's name were benami and therefore unenforceable, and subsequent permission-related challenges did not vest lawful ownership in the Appellant. Appeal dismissed.
The AT dismissed the appeal, holding the transactions to be benami. The Tribunal found that the Appellant effected indirect investment through a benamidar and family to acquire tribal lands, rather than extending a genuine loan: the benamidar disclaimed knowledge, his bank account was operated by the Appellant, no loan agreement, security or repayment capacity was demonstrated, and rapid reconveyance of several parcels to the Appellant evidenced sham transactions. Applying the statutory benami framework, the AT concluded that the 57 sale deeds in the benamidar's name were benami and therefore unenforceable, and subsequent permission-related challenges did not vest lawful ownership in the Appellant. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
