Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding the SAARC preferential Certificate of Origin (COO) valid and not shown to be forged; the adjudicating authority erred in discarding the COO without undertaking requisite verification with the issuing State and in improperly rejecting the declared Regional Value Content and origin criteria under the SAPTA rules, thereby negating entitlement under Notification No.105/1999. Electronic records seized without the statutory certificate under s.138C Customs Act and lacking s.65B compliance, and statements of third parties not subjected to cross-examination, were held inadmissible; consequently the re-valuation and duty demand failed, and penalties/confiscation were not sustained.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding the SAARC preferential Certificate of Origin (COO) valid and not shown to be forged; the adjudicating authority erred in discarding the COO without undertaking requisite verification with the issuing State and in improperly rejecting the declared Regional Value Content and origin criteria under the SAPTA rules, thereby negating entitlement under Notification No.105/1999. Electronic records seized without the statutory certificate under s.138C Customs Act and lacking s.65B compliance, and statements of third parties not subjected to cross-examination, were held inadmissible; consequently the re-valuation and duty demand failed, and penalties/confiscation were not sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.