Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding the SAARC preferential Certificate of Origin (COO) valid and not shown to be forged; the adjudicating authority erred in discarding the COO without undertaking requisite verification with the issuing State and in improperly rejecting the declared Regional Value Content and origin criteria under the SAPTA rules, thereby negating entitlement under Notification No.105/1999. Electronic records seized without the statutory certificate under s.138C Customs Act and lacking s.65B compliance, and statements of third parties not subjected to cross-examination, were held inadmissible; consequently the re-valuation and duty demand failed, and penalties/confiscation were not sustained.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding the SAARC preferential Certificate of Origin (COO) valid and not shown to be forged; the adjudicating authority erred in discarding the COO without undertaking requisite verification with the issuing State and in improperly rejecting the declared Regional Value Content and origin criteria under the SAPTA rules, thereby negating entitlement under Notification No.105/1999. Electronic records seized without the statutory certificate under s.138C Customs Act and lacking s.65B compliance, and statements of third parties not subjected to cross-examination, were held inadmissible; consequently the re-valuation and duty demand failed, and penalties/confiscation were not sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
