Petition dismissed; petitioner allowed to submit detailed disclosures and documents for re-consideration; notices for 2019-23 may be adjudicated on me...
Confiscation and duty recovery quashed where licensing records show export obligation discharged; customs lacks jurisdiction absent licence annulment ...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10161 to 10180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the demand for duty on imported components, holding there was no evidence that the components were first assembled into CTVs, tested and thereafter disassembled for clearance. The Tribunal concluded the parts did not possess the essential character of complete CTVs and thus were not exigible as finished goods; the impugned duty demand for alleged short-levy on clearance of kits was quashed. Consequentially, all penalties and interest imposed under the Central Excise enactments and rules were also set aside. Appeal accordingly allowed and impugned orders of demand, interest and penalties annulled in favour of the Appellant.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the demand for duty on imported components, holding there was no evidence that the components were first assembled into CTVs, tested and thereafter disassembled for clearance. The Tribunal concluded the parts did not possess the essential character of complete CTVs and thus were not exigible as finished goods; the impugned duty demand for alleged short-levy on clearance of kits was quashed. Consequentially, all penalties and interest imposed under the Central Excise enactments and rules were also set aside. Appeal accordingly allowed and impugned orders of demand, interest and penalties annulled in favour of the Appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
