Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10021 to 10040 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the final assessment order as ultra vires because the faceless officer issued the final order without serving the statutorily mandated draft assessment order to the eligible assessee, thereby depriving it of the opportunity to file objections before the DRP as required by Sections 144B(1)(xxi)-(xxix) read with Section 144C(15)(b)(i). The court held this procedural non-compliance fatal to the assessment and set aside the final order. The HC declined to remit the matter for any specific direction, leaving open the possibility that the AO may, if legally entitled, initiate the process afresh by serving a proper draft assessment order and proceeding in accordance with law.
The HC quashed the final assessment order as ultra vires because the faceless officer issued the final order without serving the statutorily mandated draft assessment order to the eligible assessee, thereby depriving it of the opportunity to file objections before the DRP as required by Sections 144B(1)(xxi)-(xxix) read with Section 144C(15)(b)(i). The court held this procedural non-compliance fatal to the assessment and set aside the final order. The HC declined to remit the matter for any specific direction, leaving open the possibility that the AO may, if legally entitled, initiate the process afresh by serving a proper draft assessment order and proceeding in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
