Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, quashing reassessment proceedings and consequent additions. The Tribunal held the notice under section 148 issued on 30/07/2022 barred by limitation, the six-year period having expired on 31/03/2022, and reiterated that the earlier 30/06/2021 notice could not be salvaged by TOLA. Independently, the section 148A(b) notice dated 27/05/2022 was held invalid for non-supply of the information/material forming the basis of the reasons, thereby vitiating reopening under section 147. Further, additions under section 69A were not sustained: allegations of VAT evasion and unexplained cash were uncorroborated, speculative and unsupported by any cogent cash-trail or material.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, quashing reassessment proceedings and consequent additions. The Tribunal held the notice under section 148 issued on 30/07/2022 barred by limitation, the six-year period having expired on 31/03/2022, and reiterated that the earlier 30/06/2021 notice could not be salvaged by TOLA. Independently, the section 148A(b) notice dated 27/05/2022 was held invalid for non-supply of the information/material forming the basis of the reasons, thereby vitiating reopening under section 147. Further, additions under section 69A were not sustained: allegations of VAT evasion and unexplained cash were uncorroborated, speculative and unsupported by any cogent cash-trail or material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.