Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, quashing reassessment proceedings and consequent additions. The Tribunal held the notice under section 148 issued on 30/07/2022 barred by limitation, the six-year period having expired on 31/03/2022, and reiterated that the earlier 30/06/2021 notice could not be salvaged by TOLA. Independently, the section 148A(b) notice dated 27/05/2022 was held invalid for non-supply of the information/material forming the basis of the reasons, thereby vitiating reopening under section 147. Further, additions under section 69A were not sustained: allegations of VAT evasion and unexplained cash were uncorroborated, speculative and unsupported by any cogent cash-trail or material.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, quashing reassessment proceedings and consequent additions. The Tribunal held the notice under section 148 issued on 30/07/2022 barred by limitation, the six-year period having expired on 31/03/2022, and reiterated that the earlier 30/06/2021 notice could not be salvaged by TOLA. Independently, the section 148A(b) notice dated 27/05/2022 was held invalid for non-supply of the information/material forming the basis of the reasons, thereby vitiating reopening under section 147. Further, additions under section 69A were not sustained: allegations of VAT evasion and unexplained cash were uncorroborated, speculative and unsupported by any cogent cash-trail or material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.