Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal against the Assessing Officer and CIT(A)'s treatment of the taxpayer as a defaulter under ss. 201(1)/201(1A) arising from TDS on commission payments to non-residents. The Tribunal held that the taxpayer produced requisite Form 15CBs for each non-resident remittance, applied the applicable DTAA positions, and deposited tax at source as required; accordingly there was no default under s. 201(1) r.w.s. 201(1A) or basis to sustain disallowances under s. 40(a)(i) r.w.s. 195. The impugned findings against the taxpayer were set aside and the appeal allowed.
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal against the Assessing Officer and CIT(A)'s treatment of the taxpayer as a defaulter under ss. 201(1)/201(1A) arising from TDS on commission payments to non-residents. The Tribunal held that the taxpayer produced requisite Form 15CBs for each non-resident remittance, applied the applicable DTAA positions, and deposited tax at source as required; accordingly there was no default under s. 201(1) r.w.s. 201(1A) or basis to sustain disallowances under s. 40(a)(i) r.w.s. 195. The impugned findings against the taxpayer were set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.