Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed deduction under sec.43B for amounts paid in the relevant FY and directed deletion of service tax payment of Rs.1,40,23,520 and disallowance relating to TDS, finding these were paid in the FY relevant to AY 2018-19 and reflected in ITR-6 and audit reports; it sustained disallowance of Rs.1,03,93,805 for unpaid liabilities where supporting challans/evidence were not produced. ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order and remitted the matter to the AO to give effect to these findings, delete the specified additions, and to modify penalty proceedings under sec.270A accordingly after recalculation in light of the allowed reliefs.
ITAT allowed deduction under sec.43B for amounts paid in the relevant FY and directed deletion of service tax payment of Rs.1,40,23,520 and disallowance relating to TDS, finding these were paid in the FY relevant to AY 2018-19 and reflected in ITR-6 and audit reports; it sustained disallowance of Rs.1,03,93,805 for unpaid liabilities where supporting challans/evidence were not produced. ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order and remitted the matter to the AO to give effect to these findings, delete the specified additions, and to modify penalty proceedings under sec.270A accordingly after recalculation in light of the allowed reliefs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.