Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the provisional attachment order, finding that Rs. 8 crores in the appellant's possession constituted proceeds of crime arising from a Ponzi-like scheme and were not repaid to investors with requisite proof. The tribunal rejected the appellant's contention that Rs. 1.50 crores and other sums constituted refunds or legitimate investments, noting admissions under Section 50(2) of PMLA and inconsistent, self-created documentation. Payments totaling Rs. 2,12,76,710/- for doctors, equipment and utilities were not substantiated as repayments of the secured amounts. The AT also affirmed that property valuation must reflect value at execution/possession and, absent credible proof of a Rs.100 crore valuation, attachment limited to proceeds was appropriate. Appeal dismissed.
The AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the provisional attachment order, finding that Rs. 8 crores in the appellant's possession constituted proceeds of crime arising from a Ponzi-like scheme and were not repaid to investors with requisite proof. The tribunal rejected the appellant's contention that Rs. 1.50 crores and other sums constituted refunds or legitimate investments, noting admissions under Section 50(2) of PMLA and inconsistent, self-created documentation. Payments totaling Rs. 2,12,76,710/- for doctors, equipment and utilities were not substantiated as repayments of the secured amounts. The AT also affirmed that property valuation must reflect value at execution/possession and, absent credible proof of a Rs.100 crore valuation, attachment limited to proceeds was appropriate. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
